Thursday, October 1, 2026
Wednesday, August 12, 2026
Weird Tales of Metal - The Best Heavy Metal from Europe CD (1989)
![]() |
| Apparently the best heavy metal from Europe is mostly hard rock by volume |
Imagine it's the late '80s. What? No, no. Sadly, there's no New Renaissance Rec. buying spree involved. Don't interrupt me.
So let's say you happen to be the head of a music entertainment company, an evolutionary permutation of your family's old plastics business, which itself spun off one of America's premiere manufacturers and distributors of children's records. You've got loads of experience with diversification, as in addition to the main kiddie record hustle, the record plant was pumping out all sorts of budget vinyl under various sub-labels--there was even a dedicated religious imprint. But now, it's the CD age. You want to continue the finger-in-every-pie business approach and have multiple sub-labels spanning numerous forms of music. Ultimately, you end up releasing a single* heavy metal compilation, and this is the result. Best of all, the location of your factory just so happens to lend itself to being a fantastic name for a heavy metal sub-label.
Let's not pretend for a moment that any discerning heavy metal fan should take the title literally, and that this was any kind of genuine attempt to present the best iron'n'steel late '80s Europe had to offer. It would be shocking if any compilation brazen enough to call itself The Best Heavy Metal from Europe actually delivered the goods! I would have been quite content with a compilation of solid-but-far-from-the-best Euro-HM, but sadly, this CD has all the hallmarks of being made solely to capitalize on heavy metal's commercial popularity. The wonky band selection and overall lightness just reeks of being the result of intervention/help in band selection by insidious journalistic forces (I would have suspected Kerrang!, but there's actually some (self-?)fellating of Metal Hammer in the May-Linn writeup in the booklet).
I suspect most of the people who actually bought this around the time of its release wouldn't have even been the types to fully appreciate it. Most of the tracks are pretty lightweight for anyone into traditional metal, and even for more into hard rock and hair band stuff, this was probably little more than a novelty. Despite all this, I find it intriguing that a release this late in the '80s completely disregards thrash, and just as an early overground attempt to compile some comparatively obscure and "exotic" metal/hard rock, it's an interesting relic, especially in light of the state of archaic heavy metal hunting today. On with the tracks:
Friday, February 13, 2026
Commercial Metal, Vol. 12
The "orient yourself" wordplay is clever, but of course they have to ruin it a moment later by calling this the debut album. Despite the huge step down in quality from Law of Devil's Land and Disillusion, it's not as bad as a lot of their later material. But let's face it, by 1985 they were easily outclassed by the Anthem and Reaction debuts as well as scores of smaller bands. It's unfortunate--but not any surprise--that their shift to a cornier hair band-esque aesthetic coincided with their big commercial push in America. Still, it's commendable such a heavy album got a TV spot at all.
Monday, December 26, 2022
Torn Flesh - Crux of the Mosh
Monday, August 1, 2022
Bestial Lust (random metal musings)
![]() |
| I can't wait for my sweet AliExpress t-shirt. |
Recently found a copy of The Return...... for $2. It's a particularly cheap-looking later CD version with uncrisp layout graphics, although I was happy that it had the original LP cover on the back, since my older disc only has a plain tracklist. I don't dislike it, but it's certainly my least favorite out of the first 3 Bathory albums, and even out of the first 5 depending on whether I'm in a Blood Fire Death mood or not.
A few vintage magazine reviews (mostly UK reviews, one of which I'm almost certain was from Metal Forces) referred to this as death metal. Certainly some of this had to do with the unfamiliar waters and nebulous boundaries of the embryonic extreme metal scene, so new as to lack much codification. But since the album is very bestial and even brutal in its approach, I wonder if it partially had to do with trying to describe them in a way that somewhat differentiated them from Venom (ironically, I think "Bestial Lust" is one of the purest examples of Venom worship ever done--if the English in the lyrics was cleaned up a bit and it had the Black Metal production, it would be a Venom track).
I'm far from the first to suggest the idea, but I don't really see The Return...... mentioned much as a foundational influence for all of the bestial black/death and war metal stuff. I remember immediately thinking of aspects of the album's aura and production choices when I heard Bestial Warlust and Blasphemy for the first time, and even some in the Conqueror demo too. At the same time, I also hear production aspects and the relentless approach as an influence in a lot of the faster blastbeat ridden Scandinavian styled black metal (think all the Panzer Division Marduk and Pure Holocaust type stuff), only taken to an unfortunately monotonous extreme (also makes me wonder how much of an influence the second Bathory was on Von's Satanic Blood, since there's a certain trance-like monotony to the simplistic, compact songs, although there it's a positive aspect).
Coincidentally, one of my pet peeves with the album is the weak rerecording of "The Return of the Darkness and Evil." Yes, it has a faster tempo and more "brutal" approach, yet it lacks all the wonderful charismatic touches of the original like the drum intro and the ultra evil reverb drenched vocals. Applied on a much larger scale, these are the same reasons why a lot of the extreme metal scene kind of disinterested me after the late '80s and early '90s--like that new version of "The Return of the Darkness and Evil," it seemed more sterile. And less metal.
Sunday, October 10, 2021
Females are Clueless About Metal, Vol. 4.
Maybe it's unwelcoming because you're kind of a dum dum?
It seems like the, uh, research for this article was done by playing a game of telephone. Why not just copy/paste from the Wikipedia article on Mayhem?Thursday, May 6, 2021
After the Fall from Grace
I've been aware of Savage Grace's reactivation, and while I don't really have any particular expectations, I do think it has the potential to be more interesting than the 2010 gigs considering Chris Logue will be on guitar again. I was web surfing earlier and what I was unfortunately not aware of is that THE SAVAGE GRACE WEBSITE IS FUCKING INSANE.
As a huge Savage Grace fan (well, at least of their '80s stuff*), I don't mean that in a smarmy SJW-esque way either. Despite me being terribly late on this, as soon as I saw some of the crazy shit on there, I knew I had to make a blog post.
Eh, as much as I love Master of Disguise--it's almost (but not quite**) neck and neck with Skeptics Apocalypse as my favorite US speed metal album--this is some terribly overzealous embellishment at best. I subscribe to what I think is a pretty standard view: Priest, Accept, and Anvil having early examples of individual speed metal tracks, and the Exciter debut being the first overall speed metal album. As for the US? Never really thought about it too much. I consider The Dominatress and the early SG stuff to be far more USPM than speed metal anyway. Perhaps the '82 Exodus demo, or the Abattoir or Sceptre demo stuff?
Then there's the book:
*"Crazy Saturday Night" is musically decent, but most of that lame early '90s hard rock shit they did makes me want to sing "HE'S THE JUDAS OF US ALL...BE-TRAYAAAAAAAH! BE-TRAYAAAAAAAH!"
**Don't feel bad. Cyriis was clearly a gift to metal from extraterrestrial forces.
Friday, April 30, 2021
And that band was called Hiroshima.
**The expanded edition of the CD with the Hinch tracks holds the distinction of being one of only two CDs I've ever bought at a Wal-Mart (and which are the only times I've ever gotten music at a regular department store, in fact). Wondering what the other was, aren't you? The Eternal Masters Black Sabbath tribute with Cadaver and Cannibal Corpse.
Thursday, April 22, 2021
Warfare, Noise
I recently came across this:
The visuals are obviously entertaining, but the music, not so much. This could use some overdubbing with something more thematically appropriate like Holocausto (speaking of which, I have yet to hear Diário de Guerra yet and don't have very high hopes for it, but the artwork is FUCKING KILLER. Reminds me of a Ghanaian movie poster version of the Persecution Mania cover).
In fact, there are a slew of high budget vids (I'm not going to bother linking them all):
The corpsepainted Tommy Wiseau/Pete Sandoval hybrid is the father of the younger fellow, which makes total sense in context. Offhand I can't think of any examples of metal nepotism resulting in anything great, only things like a garbage Omen album. In addition to this, there are also vids for the duo's punk project and some extremely cheap looking short film stuff, which all seemingly exist to showcase the son's production, edting, and CG, uh, skills.
While I wholeheartedly support the impalement of Fenriz, of course the great irony here is that pointlessly generic lo-fi black metal and dorky corpsepaint are themselves metal fads that desperately need to be summarily executed. This almost reminds me of how Beelzeebubth from Mystifier seemed staunchly traditionalist and against stereotypical Norwegian BM trends--very sensibly so--in past interviews, but rather than the nighttime Christ-abusing maniacs of the debut, his current bandmates look like a laughable appropriation of '90s Scandinavian BM aesthetics by middle-aged men.
I was pleasantly surprised to find that some of the older songs posted on YouTube are more listenable, with less ridiculous vocals and the semblance of something like actual drums. Sadly, the associated videos are far less visually exciting.
There's also a track which Metal-Archives claims is from 1991, long before the son was involved:
Tuesday, December 8, 2020
Lee Aaron - Two Masculine Names, One Mediocre Album
One of my eventual plans for this blog is a regular feature based on brutally honest reviews of females in metal bands (particularly '80s), both in terms of looks and music (Spoiler alerts: Acid and Holy Moses are terribly overrated, one of the greatest female contributions to metal ever was done by a pop/rock songwriter under a pseudonym, and you're probably safe from
I never thought of Lee Aaron as a world-class beauty, but she was attractive in her 20s, and certainly hotter than most females associated with rock music. It could be argued that Lee's topless photos for Oui are more interesting than her music ever was, but given her smallish tits and severely overdone hair/makeup, I never found them all that titillating. Unfortunately, she remained clothed in later pictures with less exaggerated coifs, although she still had a penchant for odd photoshoots--posing with truck exhaust stacks, wielding a crowbar, and of course the whole Metal Queen budget barbarian thing.
The album's guitar sound may lean towards the heavy--yet polished--side, but there are only two actual metal tracks on Metal Queen. The solemn intro and epic aspirations of the title track initially point to Dio, although it clearly also wants to be a simplistic, catchy Twisted Sister/Quiet Riot-type anthem (complete with gang vocals in the chorus). The solo section is genuinely great, and I also hear some Thor undercurrents in the main riff--with some minor tweaking, it wouldn't sound terribly out of place on Only the Strong. "Deceiver" is the album's speedy tune; it opens like Loudness circa '85 and then settles into the Priest veneration typical of the heavier strain of '80s mainstream metal.
As for the rest of the album, well, "Lady of the Darkest Night" is pretty catchy, and "Steal Away Your Love" is notable
Lee would have been quite a formidable female metal vocalist had she had consistently heavy stuff to sing on. She reminds me of Jan Melanson from the first Reckless album (ironically, another Canadian release that typically has its metalness greatly exaggerated) mixed with Ann Boelyn and Leather Leone (though not quite as gritty and husky as either).
The two metal songs are solid quality-wise (PROTIP: get the Australian promo 7" if you want all killer, no filler) and I wouldn't hesitate to throw them on for some occasional variety. They were never in the running as contenders for truly great metal songs, though--female-fronted or otherwise.
Finally, the video of the title track:
Saturday, December 5, 2020
AMON GUITARIST ASSAULTS DRUNKEN RAPE ROCKER
Here's the full Deicide set; Duce appears during "Carnage in the Temple of the Damned" at 18:51:
Never seen Glen address this incident. I would assume it was a non-event for him, but he definitely seems like someone who would have appreciated the Mentors. On the other hand, I get the impression that the Hoffman brothers tend to be the humorless sort (although really, how true can that be if you allow someone named Jechael in your band?).
Of course, this wasn't the only Deicide-related drama during the '92 Metalfest--according to Ted Kirkpatrick, Deicide threatened not to play if Tourniquet wasn't knocked off the bill. Yeah, in theory it's kind of lame, but it's hard to be sympathetic given Tourniquet's output after their first three albums. Tourniquet wasn't the only no-show listed on the flyer, as Cirith Ungol had dissolved months before the fest; if I remember correctly, they were still listed on Metalfest promotional material for a deceptively long time.
The rising popularity of death metal combined with pay-to-play logistics and overstuffed band lineups made the 1992 iteration feel like an oddly transitional fest even before multi-stage antics. Previous Metalfest rosters were largely thrash dominated and unerringly metal-focused for the most part, aside from weird genre-nebulous outliers (Last Crack) and the smattering of more HC/punk-associated bands (yeah yeah, I guess Ludichrist, '88 Cro-Mags, Impulse Manslaughter, etc. are defensible enough, but if you're the type of oddball who would prefer seeing Murphy's Law over a New Renaissance Rec. signee, why are you even here?). By 1992, the focus was clearly on death metal, although as the musical extremity increased, so did the amount of non-metal acts. The plot gradually shifted to a largely death metal fest with some odd shit added; by the mid '90s, it seemed less like a decent metal festival and more like a gauntlet of numerous opening sets to be endured in order to catch Venom, Sodom, Exodus, or some semi-interesting mid-tier band. I skipped on the final years, and while the lineups concentrated heavily on death and black metal, the bands were largely mediocre, either from their inception or through hanging around past their primes long enough to wear out their welcome (on the plus side, it seems like the overtly non-metal stuff was toned down, or at least seemed more diluted due to the huge volume of bands).
I didn't intend for this to be a general Milwaukee Metalfest post, but I wanted to get some thoughts down, as unfortunately I don't anticipate scraping together enough material for a separate dedicated post. A reason for this is the lack of documentation--even after a few minutes of searching, I found nothing online about UFO's ridiculous 1995 soundcheck and the ensuing clusterfuck. I feel reasonably certain Michael Angelo Batio played a quad guitar one year, but that also yielded nothing (was it ever documented by a primitive Geocities or Angelfire site that has been lost to time, or was it merely a Nitro-induced fever dream in my mind?).
They may not be able to carry a post on their own, but witnessing Cronos' neat stripey pants and that weird version of Destruction fronted by the alternative rock-looking guy are metal memories to cherish and enjoy nonetheless.
Saturday, March 28, 2020
Saturday, December 21, 2019
Commercial Metal, Vol. 11
Thursday, September 12, 2019
Of the Ephemeral
"There's this romantic notion of metal continuing indefinitely as some deep musical or cultural achievement. But humanity always finds ways to express taboo and dark subjects, whether musically or not.
Venom, Bathory, Celtic Frost, Possessed, etc., and the bands that came after resonated with us a lot, and for a variety of reasons. Future generations will have to decide for themselves if there is anything relevant in that music, and that will say a lot about the world in which they live at the time."
Saturday, August 10, 2019
Because There's No Shame in Reusing a Good Idea, Vol. 4 - Hellfire
Saturday, May 4, 2019
Because There's No Shame in Reusing a Good Idea, Vol. 3 - Guillotine
Typically when music is tagged as "Kreator worship," it's a gross exaggeration. Most often it seems to be used as a cheap marketing tactic to compare (usually far lesser) recordings to Pleasure to Kill, but it's also fairly common to see anything remotely thrashy with raspy vocals get a Kreator comparison. Guillotine have something in their favor though:
THEY ARE BLATANTLY UNORIGINAL.
Yes, the main reason this is so Endless Pain sounding is--suprise, suprise--a good deal of the material is based on slightly changed Endless Pain riffs and chord patterns. "Executioner" is clearly derived from "Living in Fear," "Leprosy" from "Tormentor," and "Guillotine" from "Bone Breaker." The individual song homages are kind of dispensed with by the middle of the album (though the chorus of "Total Mayhem" definitely evokes "Pleasure to Kill"***), and instead there are multiple variations on [Kreator's] "Tormentor" mixed with slightly broader Teutonic thrash influences.
As much as these tracks sound like debut-era Kreator, Guillotine doesn't quite emulate the entire Endless Pain album as a whole. Unfortunately, there's no attempt at Ventor-style caveman vocals, and while Spider's snarling vocals work just fine, they aren't particularly Mille sounding, either. There are also sadly no Guillotine equivalents for some of the more speed metal-influenced songs such as "Son of Evil" or "Cry War." Under the Guillotine is tighter and more streamlined than Endless Pain and vicious in its own way, but also less barbaric. There's a wonderful atmosphere of embryonic extreme metal savagery to the Kreator debut; it's not quite as untight as early Sodom or some of the South American stuff, but there are definite moments where the band seem to be about to go off the rails. Frankly, Guillotine is a bit too musically proficient to really replicate that effectively.
In most cases, clone bands are good at mimicking the sound and style of the target band, but end up writing far more mediocre (or worse) material. I'm not going to pretend Guillotine are always fully on par with old Kreator, but simply dismissing them due to unoriginality is to overlook some fine thrash. They are especially good at coming up with killer choruses ("Violence," "Night Stalker"), and Guillotine's own "Tormentor" is a surprisingly great non-'80s addition to the songtitle's legacy.
As if having a whole album of old Kreator sounding tracks wasn't enough, the '80s veneration even extends to the CD layout and disc face. The Grim Reaper on the cover could have easily adorned a volume of Metal Massacre, the inner booklet tracklisting looks like it came straight off a cheapo LaserLight CD, and there is a page dedicated to CD care and handling instructions (thoughtfully provided in several languages). REMEMBER TO USE A CLEAN CLOTH AND WIPE FROM CENTER TO EDGE. Unfortunately, the Necropolis website/email info on the back ruin what is otherwise an impeccably done retro layout.
As with the whole Scandinavian '90s retrothrash movement as a whole, the album seems to be a bit divisive. I can understand decrying its pure unoriginality to certain extent, but then again, that's the entire point, and hardly a quality indicator. Amusingly, the band name alone is apparently quite triggering. I'm also confused as to why sloppy lo-fi Destruction emulation is acceptable but Kreator emulation is not, or how someone sober could conclude Desekrator's Metal for Demons is a superior album. Perhaps these people don't like old Kreator, which is a concept I have trouble grasping. For the record, I've never been particularly bothered by musical emulators, clones, homages, or ripoffs, as long as the results were good. There are exceptions, of course, but I feel there's a lot more good metal coming from bands trying to emulate old sounds and aesthetics than from bands trying to be "original" and push boundaries. I am far more interested in enjoying a quality listening experience than broadening my musical horizons.
"Back when we did the first album, we deliberately tried to make everything sound and even look retro. We wanted every aspect of the album to breathe the 80s - and it truly did."
- Nils Eriksson****
*I obviously haven't heard every demo out there (hopefully there's more great Kreator worship to be discovered), but prior to Guillotine, I think the best and most notable example was Necrodeath's Fragments of Insanity, which would have been a better followup to PtK than Terrible Certainty was.
**Tied with the Nifelheim debut. Special mentions to early The Black too.
***The only real instance on the album. I remember when this was released, I saw some reviewers and distro blurbs call it Pleasure to Kill worship--either they didn't actually listen to it and just made a false association between the band name and "Under the Guillotine," or they're nitwits who weren't well-versed in thrash metal.
****I have yet to hear the entire thing, but what I did hear from the Blood Money album was personally disappointing. It sounded far more like newer Destruction than old Kreator glorification. "War" lifts that riff about midway through straight from Death's "Left to Die," so at least they're still showing some commitment to rehashing classic stuff.
Monday, March 11, 2019
Anvil: The Story of Anvil
- No matter how brief the appearance, any movie is immediately improved by inclusion of footage of one of the Nifelheim twins and/or Carmen Appice.
- Honestly, onstage persona aside, Lips comes off as...very boring. I realize the blue collar family man thing fits the context of the documentary, and it's well past the heyday of the band when the majority of any debauchery was likely to happen, but c'mon...The guy's gimmick is playing guitar with a vibrator, and he came up with some fairly raunchy sex-themed songs to boot! It's pretty disappointing that serving mac and cheese to his kid is the best footage of his home life they could come up with. At least Robb's painting hobby was somewhat interesting.
- Speaking of raunch, were either of these chicks subject to the activities of any of the more colorful Anvil songs? They've got kids, so they clearly weren't Backwaxing all the time, and neither of them look like they could fill a D cup:
![]() |
| Anvil Wives: Have They Been Doin' the Butter-Bust Jerky? |
![]() |
| Solid fashion choices compared to the Sabotage cover |
*I was extremely annoyed that the Canadian and European versions of Plenty of Power had mutually exclusive bonus tracks.
**What happened to the bawdy sex songs that used to be an Anvil staple? I just realized when writing this post the last overt one was "Mattress Mambo" on Speed of Sound over 20 years ago!
Tuesday, December 4, 2018
Scott Ian - Swearing Words in Glasgow DVD
Monday, February 19, 2018
Hades - Rogues March
This is one of those times.
Friday, January 26, 2018
Whereabouts of: The Ultimate Revenge interviewers & Major Mayhem
Luckily, we can look up some of the credited individuals:
![]() |
| "Can we say FUCK?" "Yes. It's for the home." |
![]() |
| Can't tell if he is trying not to crack up at Slayer's drunk antics or hiding mild discomfort. |

























